Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The Wheels on the Bus

In an effort to save some money (I've yet to be convinced of the positive environmental effects) I've started riding the bus to and from work.

It's a unique experience; full of surprises. For one, the movies are wrong: bus riders do NOT sing "The Wheels On The Bus" or "Hail To The Bus Driver" as they merrily commute. No, instead they just sit there with sad little looks on their faces. Most of them hide their eyes behind sunglasses, even when it's cloudy, or bury their noses in books, or block out attempts at conversation by sticking earbuds in their ears. And judging from the bass rhythm which seeps out, they're not listening to "The Wheels On The Bus."

I, too, am guilty of plugging my ears with the tunes I've placed on my newly purchased iPod Shuffle. But I've made a concerted effort to remove my sunglasses when I'm not facing the sun.

For those of you who don't take the bus, there is an unwritten seating protocol once you board. If there is one other passenger on the bus and he's in a 2 person bench, it's very bad form (unless you know the person) to sit in the other seat on that bench. Instead, you are expected to uphold a certain symmetry by sitting on the opposite side of the bus an approximately equidistant (fig. 1) measurement from the back of the bus as the other passenger is from the front of the bus, or vice versa.

When the bus is more full but some benches are still empty, you should always leave an empty bench in between you and the next person in front of you (fig.2). This is because your comfort zone, or personal body space, is based on what you see in front of you. Additionally, this sends a message to the other passengers, "I don't want to be here any more than you do, so let's just agree to leave each other alone and hope this ends soon." It is irrelevant that your choice of seat intrudes upon the same personal body space of the person behind you; at this point as a bus gains passengers, there is no alternative. Body space will be intruded upon; it is only a matter of time now.

Now, we start to reach the area of most concern: the seats are mostly full, and strangers have to start to double up. You can see it on the faces of people as they board a near-capacity bus: "Who's not going to talk to me? Who's safe? Who looks too intimidating or is likely to smell funny?" They scan the other passengers and make a decision.

Once you've made a decision, it's unacceptable to change your mind, unless one of the following conditions is met:
  • You see somebody you know, seated alone, and move to sit with that person
  • An entire 2-person bench opens up
Only in these two circumstances are you absolved from your duty to remain your seat-buddy's traveling companion. If you misjudged and picked a smelly person, too bad. You have to tough it out.

I must emit some kind of uninviting aura, and I'm not sure how to feel about it. For inevitably, the new passengers on the bus will sit with anybody else before they resign to the only available seat left and sit with me (fig.3).


Buses are great places to find masters of body language. If somebody seated in a window seat wishes to disembark but is blocked by his seat buddy, all he has to do is put his book away, fold up his newspaper, cap his beverage, adjust his coat, or some other subtle sign indicating, "I'm ready to end the charade of community and take my leave from this dismal conveyance." The supreme masters can do it with a slight tilt of the head; the occasional-riders have to the pull the 'stop request' cord, even if it's already been pulled. You know a total newbie when he turns to you, takes his earbuds out, and uses words to the effect of, "Excuse me please, this is my stop."

Whatever the method, once you've indicated that you need to leave, you are usually on a bus so crowded that people are standing in the aisles (fig.4). The horde responds quite adeptly to a passenger making his way to an exit; it's a grand demonstration of a collective, although silent, sigh of relief: "Thank goodness! One less person to tolerate."

Yes, taking the bus is a real adventure in sociology and psychology.

Plus, I can listen to a whole lot of music.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Child # 5*

Well, many of you may have heard already, but for those of you who haven't...

My wife is pregnant!



This will be our fifth* baby! The due date will probably be somewhere in February.

*sixth

Funniest Gag Ever

Friday, June 06, 2008

Freedom


Thanks to my buddy and fellow convert Owen for sketching my escape from Convergys!

I do believe he's shutting his down his "A Sketch for $2" series, so if you want him to doodle something for you, hurry up!

Monday, June 02, 2008

Cork

Yes, I've been to Cork, Ireland (I loved the cathedrals in that area), but that's not the subject of this post.

Nor am I writing about the fascinating science behind the harvesting and utilization of cork (from Quercus suber) to seal wine bottles.

Instead, I wish to rant about yet another intrusion into the dignity of man. And I do mean man.

Popular Science is waxing enthusiastically about the future of male contraception. One of the new methods will be a small plug medically inserted at the mouth of the vas deferens, which essentially bars the door so sperm cannot get out. If you check out the photo gallery in that link, you'll see the cutest little graphic which helps us get the idea:



According to the article, over half of men surveyed are willing to assume the gift of infertility, presumably out of undying love for the women in their lives.

Now perhaps I'll offend some of my more sensible readers by saying this, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would purposefully cause a fully functional body part to stop working. Especially when there is a safer, better, and morally sound alternative. Any man who pursues infertility is doing it for one reason and one reason alone: consequence-free sex.

Some may wonder how this alternative, known as Natural Family Planning, is any different from an artificial method, since, when one is seeking to avoid pregnancy, the end result is the same. But we must remember that ends do not justify means. The methods we use matter.

So despite the exciting new technology, artificial male contraception is just as scandalous and selfish as the female variety, if not moreso - for men are already, by their impregnable nature, more able to walk away from the byproducts of sex. Women, if you have any sense, you'll forbid your man from indulging himself in this demeaning act of self-mutilation.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Meanwhile, While the Ottawa Senators Are Golfing...

Remember this post from a few months back? The Sens' wives & girlfriends had elected to donate part of their Christmas fundraiser to First Place Pregnancy Centre, and the CBC erupted in rage and threw up a big fuss. Because the FPPC doesn't refer to abortuaries.

There's a bit more to the story, apparently.

It seems that the arch-nemesis of all things pro-life, Planned Parenthood, had been doing some string pulling behind the curtains. In a press release today, FPPC alleges that Planned Parenthood "interfered with critical funding and defamed their charity putting the charity and the women they serve at risk." So First Place is suing.

Read the press release. And do what you can to help them out; legal fees are nasty.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

New Job

Well folks, I've finally done it. I've resigned at Convergys.

I've been there for seven years and done quite well for myself. But due to my general sense of dissatisfaction with the way the business is going (and not being invested enough in the company to try to change it myself), as well as the horrid schedule I had to work, I've been actively looking for work elsewhere for several months.

I've finally landed a great job: I'll be doing logistics and coordination of moves for a moving & storage company. It's a completely different switch from call center management, but it's a good switch. I won't be in management, which I currently consider a positive thing - I'm quite tired of being held responsible for other peoples' performance.

The best thing about this job is the schedule: I'll be off at 5:00 PM every day, instead of times varying from 3:00 PM to 2:00 AM. Plus, it's Monday - Friday, instead of seven days a week.

Finally, I get to have a normal family life. It's gonna be nice.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Swords Up!

Back in my private Christian school days, our pastor used to hold "sword drills." He'd start by saying, "Swords up!" and we'd all raise our Bibles over our heads. Then he'd shout out a Scripture reference, like "John 4:18." The first student to find the passage would stand up and read it. It was great practice at getting to know the Bible.

Well, people, swords up!

Take a look at this advice column in the Toronto Star, entitled, "Don't look to the Good Book for advice about sexual ethics."

The question, raised by a parent confused as to how to impart Christian sexual ethics to a 14 year old daughter, is how to back up a ban on pre-marital sex using Scripture (my first tip to this parent: don't ask the Toronto Star about how to follow the Christian faith).

The response, by Ken Gallinger, is that the Bible does not have such a ban, but instead claims that Scripture speaks instead of the "trust, fidelity, respect and mutuality that must be present for human relationships to be happy." He also claims that Jesus himself "couldn't care less about premarital sex." (ahem... see John 4:18)

Ken is kind enough to include an email address for further questions. Shall we enlighten him about what Scripture really says?

This, by the way, is why Sola Scriptura was a bad idea. See Acts 9:31.

Friday, April 18, 2008

You Deserved That






It has come to my attention that some of the videos YouTube suggests when finished watching this video are inappropriate; please use discretion. This is the Internet, after all.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Too Bad

Well, my Ottawa Senators have carried their post-All Star slump straight down the Playoff toilet. At least nobody can accuse them of choking this year - choking implies they were breathing well prior to the playoffs. They were lucky to make it to the post-season dance at all this year.

Still, they did better than Toronto AGAIN and that's always comforting. Also nice to note is that they'll have lots of salary room next year, as pricey defenceman Wade Redden (the highest-paid defenseman whose contract expires this year) will probably not be re-signed and high-highfalutin' goaltender Ray Emery will find a home somewhere that's big enough for his ego (maybe he can play with Alexei Yashin in Russia). The trades made this season offloading some of the smaller-salary players like Joe Corvo, Patrick Eaves, and Peter Shaeffer for rental players up for unrestricted free agency this summer also help in that regard. Those trades and the UFA happenings will save the Sens about $16 million, but about $10 million of that is already eaten up by Spezza, Heatley, Alfredsson, and Fisher's increases next season. Assuming they can't get rid of Emery, they'll have about $6 million to spend signing some Phillips or Volchenkov level defensemen, and that's the direction in which they've got to go.

So while this season ended poorly, the core is still intact and shouldn't be touched. The young talent is developing nicely, they have solid goaltending in Martin Gerber, and are well-positioned financially for the summer trading frenzy.

For now, dear chums in Red & White, enjoy your golfing. We'll root for you next year! Go Sens Go!